My Photo

My Photo Gallery

  • Orange County Chopper
    Here are a few photos from the Photo Gallery that you can find on my website. More to come, so stay tuned! www.JohnFenzel.com

Our Support Network

RSS Feeds

  • AddThis Feed Button

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Notable People

  • Gary Heidt
    John's Literary Agent
  • Ciri Fenzel
    Ciri is the founder of Breathe Marketing, specializing in brand communication and solutions at retail.
  • Donatella Lorch
    A war correspondent who humanizes the cost and politics of war
  • Seth Godin
    Seth is a writer, a speaker and an agent of change.

Books I Recommend

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 11/2006

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Science

    May 27, 2008

    Physics Exam: Describe how to determine the height of a skyscraper with a barometer

    The following concerns a question in a physics degree exam at the University of Copenhagen:

    "Describe how to determine the height of a skyscraper with a barometer."

    One student replied:

    "You tie a long piece of string to the neck of the barometer, then lower the barometer from the roof of the skyscraper to the ground. The length of the string plus the length of the barometer will equal the height of the building."

    This highly original answer so incensed the examiner that the student was failed immediately. He appealed on the grounds that his answer was indisputably correct, and the university appointed an independent arbiter to decide the case. The arbiter judged that the answer was indeed correct, but did not display any noticeable knowledge of physics. To resolve the problem it was decided to call the student in and allow him six minutes in which to provide a verbal answer which showed at least a minimal familiarity with the basic principles of physics. For five minutes the student sat in silence, forehead creased in thought. The arbiter reminded him that time was running out, to which the student replied that he had several extremely relevant answers, but couldn't make up his mind which to use. On being advised to hurry up the student replied as follows:

    "Firstly, you could take the barometer up to the roof of the skyscraper, drop it over the edge, and measure the time it takes to reach the ground. The height of the building can then be worked out from the formula H = 0.5g x t squared. But bad luck on the barometer.

    "Or if the sun is shining you could measure the height of the barometer, then set it on end and measure the length of its shadow. Then you measure the length of the skyscraper's shadow, and thereafter it is a simple matter of proportional arithmetic to work uut the height of the skyscraper.

    "But if you wanted to be highly scientific about it, you could tie a short piece of string to the barometer and swing it like a pendulum, first at ground level and then on the roof of the skyscraper. The height is worked out by the difference in the gravitational restoring force T = 2 pi sqrroot (l/g).

    "Or if the skyscraper has an outside emergency staircase, it would be easier to walk up it and mark off the height of the skyscraper in barometer lengths, then add them up.

    "If you merely wanted to be boring and orthodox about it, of course, you could use the barometer to measure the air pressure on the roof of the skyscraper and on the ground, and convert the difference in millibars into feet to give the height of the building.

    But since we are constantly being exhorted to exercise independence of mind and apply scientific methods, undoubtedly the best way would be to knock on the janitor's door and say to him 'If you would like a nice new barometer, I will give you this one if you tell me the height of this skyscraper'."

    The student was Niels Bohr, the first Dane to win the Nobel prize for Physics.

    Niels_Bohr

    Source: The Humor Archives

    April 27, 2008

    When Galaxies Collide...

    Galaxy_collision
    Arp 148, shown here, is the staggering aftermath of an encounter between two galaxies, resulting in a ring-shaped galaxy and a long-tailed companion. This image is part of a large collection of 59 photos of merging galaxies taken by the Hubble Space Telescope.

    Source: MSNBC

    September 18, 2007

    Voyager's View :: Uranus and her Moons

    Uranusandmoons_voyager_2


    June 29, 2007

    Space Shuttle Launch...

    Space_shuttle_launch


    May 12, 2007

    Steven Hawking's Message of Hope: "...Make Sure We Keep Talking."

    Stephen_hawking

    For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals.
    Then something happened which unleashed the power of our imagination.
    We learned to talk.
    And we learned to listen.
    Speech has allowed the communication of ideas, enabling human beings to work together.
    To build the impossible.
    Mankind's greatest achievements have come about by talking.
    And it's greatest failures by NOT talking.
    It doesn't have to be like this!
    Our greatest hopes could become reality in the future.
    With the technology at our disposal, the possibilities are unbounded.
    All we need to do
    is make sure
    we keep talking.

    -Stephen W. Hawking

    January 19, 2007

    Interpreting the Consumer Reports' Retraction Regarding Infant Car Seats

    Infant_car_seatAs the parent of a five-week-old infant, I was one of those who readily purchased the February 2007 issue of Consumer Reports Magazine, primarily because of their article, "SAFETY ALERT: 10 infant car seats FAIL our tests." Now, we're told that some of the test crashes were conducted at speeds higher than it had originally claimed. We're also told that after concerned parents called into their hotline, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) went so far as to perform its own tests "and brought the error to the magazine’s attention." NHTSA said Consumer Reports' crash tests were conducted under conditions that would represent being struck "at more than 70 mph" --twice as fast as the magazine contended. Now, Consumer Reports is saying that they will retest the car seats and issue a replacement article soon.

    After wading through the dozens of news reports on this, I'm left wondering whether we're being told the whole story on what compelled Consumer Reports to retract their article. Was it really the calls from concerned parents? Or could it have been the threats flooding in from the attorneys of the manufacturers and retailers of those car seats that did not perform so well in these (perhaps) overzealous tests?

    There's a sub-article in the same Consumer Reports piece with the headline: "A Seat sold abroad outperforms U.S. models." Here is an excerpt:

    "Infant seats sold in England and the 24 other countries of the European Union must meet safety standards that include a 31-mph frontal crash. Many are also tested in a 40-mph frontal crash and a 31-mph side collision. The results are teh basis of widely publicized safety ratings for cars. The ratings include an assessment of how a car seat performs in a specific car. Automakers are required to make those seats available for purchase.

    In the U.S., car seats must withstand only a 30-mph frontal crash, even though most passenger vehicles are tested in a 35-mph frontal crash and a 38-mph frontal crash and 38-mph side impact.

    Another notable difference between the European and U.S. infant seats we tested is that the European Cosy Tot includes an attachment or "foot" as part of the base that adds stability in frontal crashes.

    The U.S. safety standard makes it difficult for companies to incorporate the foot into U.S. car-seat designs because of the way compliance testing is conducted.

    ...Peter Claeson, secretary of the Standards Working Group for Child Restraints for the International Standards Organization says a common safety standard for car seats would benefit everyone. "If you could agree on what is a good regulation worldwide, it is good for all parties," Claeson says. "It is much easier for consumers to be confident that they have a safe seat."

    Here is the note from the President of Consumer Reports, Jim Guest, who signed his name to the report (my emphasis added):

    Consumer_reports

    "...the images I saw of our latest tests filled me with dread: Dummies tumbled like Raggedy Anns, seats flew across the lab, plastic bases cracked, and LATCH straps broke.

    You will ask why a car seat that rated tops in our 2005 report did so poorly in our current tests.... The answer is that this time, we held the seats to more rigourous standards. Our new measure: We simply applied the same safety parameters for car seats that are applied to vehicles themselves.

    You will ask why a seat that failed the current federal standard is even on the market. We have the same question, and we believe that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the manufacturer must recall the Evenflo Discovery infant seat immediately. We judge it Not Acceptable.

    You will ask why infant car seats sold in other countries undergo a battery of tough tests including front and side crashes whose results are widely publicized, while seats in the U.S. do not....

    You will ask why the LATCH (short for Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children) system, which was designed to make it easier to secure child car seats safely in place, has proved to be so unreliable. We have the same question, and we want to see a system that any of us could use with confidence."

    Extremely bold language from the president of one of the most trusted magazines in America. I don't think those words were taken lightly. Maybe the real lesson Consumer Reports learned from this is not to square up against the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. That's essentially what they did with their very public disclosure that Europe has a higher, safer standard than we do in the United States--and then they illustrated it graphically by testing American-manufactured infant car seats against the Euro standard! We failed with flying colors.

    That's embarrassing.

    It's also a disgrace. You would expect the wealthiest and most technologically advanced nation in the world to have a safety standard that is equal to or more stringent than the Europeans'. But that's not the case--our standards are lower than Europe's.

    Mostly, though, it's frightening.

    There are three kinds of mistakes: mistakes of ignorance, mistakes of ommission, and mistakes of commission. The worst is the latter--mistakes of commission, because you know it's wrong and you not only go along with it, you act in concert with others around you to commit the error intentionally. Then, particularly when you're affecting the safety of the public (in this case infants), you begin to begin to encroach upon the realm of the criminally culpable. Those honest, concerned citizens who have the ability to see it occurring normally won't remain silent. Nor should they.

    Therefore, if parents called the NHTSA, as is being widely reported, my guess is that most of them weren't so much complaining about the CR report, or so much worried about their car seat, as they were demanding to know why our regulations aren't as safe as the EU's....

    I'll bet the pressure on Consumer Reports from NHTSA and opposing corporate attorneys from retailers and manfucturers was so relentless that the magazine had no choice but to retract their article or lawyer up.

    Was this a glaring example of the regulators being in bed with the regulated? That's the question I expected the media to ask. But they haven't.

    Yet.

    So, why is the media is only focusing on the retraction and not the underlying reasons behind it? Here's my uninformed speculation: Once Consumer Reports was effectively silenced, the news releases from NHTSA and the manufacturers of the failed car seats were the only talking points they had before the deadline for the evening news cycle. That's the way these things typically unfold.

    Britax_cosy_tot_premiumFrom my perspective as a consumer and as a parent, the February 2007 edition of Consumer Reports was, by any measure, an excellent investment. If you have an infant or are planning on having one any time soon, I'd recommend you get a copy too. After reading it and the subsequent retraction, we're now putting our order in for the Britax Cosy Tot, which was the top performer in the Consumer Reports test...intuitively, wouldn't you expect that if it worked well at 70+ mph, it should have our confidence at 35-mph too? My instinct tells me that the reverse logic wouldn't necessarily hold true.

    As for my confidence in NHTSA and American infant car seat manufacturers...well, at least for now, that's another story.

    Many thanks, Consumer Reports (and Good Luck!)--and don't get caught speeding again.

    January 13, 2007

    Interesting Equation...

    Equation

    111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321

    January 01, 2007

    What the Flu Really Looks Like...

    Molecular Anatomy Of Influenza Virus Detailed

    Science Daily — Scientists at the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), part of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md., and colleagues at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville have succeeded in imaging, in unprecedented detail, the virus that causes influenza.

    Flu_image
    The three-dimensional structure of influenza virus from electron tomography. The viruses are about 120 nanometers -- about one ten thousandth of a millimeter -- in diameter.

    A team of researchers led by NIAMS' Alasdair Steven, Ph.D., working with a version of the seasonal H3N2 strain of influenza A virus, has been able to distinguish five different kinds of influenza virus particles in the same isolate (sample) and map the distribution of molecules in each of them. This breakthrough has the potential to identify particular features of highly virulent strains, and to provide insight into how antibodies inactivate the virus, and how viruses recognize susceptible cells and enter them in the act of infection.

    “Being able to visualize influenza virus particles should boost our efforts to prepare for a possible pandemic flu attack,” says NIAMS Director Stephen I. Katz, M.D., Ph.D. “This work will allow us to ‘know our enemy' much better.”

    One of the difficulties that has hampered structural studies of influenza virus is that no two virus particles are the same. In this fundamental respect, it differs from other viruses; poliovirus, for example, has a coat that is identical in each virus particle, allowing it to be studied by crystallography.

    The research team used electron tomography (ET) to make its discovery. ET is a novel, three-dimensional imaging method based on the same principle as the well-known clinical imaging technique called computerized axial tomography, but it is performed in an electron microscope on a microminiaturized scale.

    The mission of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), a part of the Department of Health and Human Services' National Institutes of Health, is to support research into the causes, treatment, and prevention of arthritis and musculoskeletal and skin diseases; the training of basic and clinical scientists to carry out this research; and the dissemination of information on research progress in these diseases.

    December 29, 2006

    The vaccine to prevent every strain of flu

    Flu_vaccineThe vaccine to prevent every strain of flu
    by FIONA MacRAE

    British scientists are on the verge of producing a revolutionary flu vaccine that works against all major types of the disease.

    Described as the 'holy grail' of flu vaccines, it would protect against all strains of influenza A - the virus behind both bird flu and the nastiest outbreaks of winter flu.

    Just a couple of injections could give long-lasting immunity - unlike the current vaccine which has to be given every year.

    The brainchild of scientists at Cambridge biotech firm Acambis, working with Belgian researchers, the vaccine will be tested on humans for the first time in the next few months.

    A similar universal flu vaccine, being developed by Swiss vaccine firm Cytos Biotechnology, could also be tested on people in 2007 - and the vaccines on the market in around five years.

    Importantly, the vaccines would also be quicker and easier to make than the traditional jabs, meaning vast quantities could be stockpiled against a global outbreak of bird flu.

    Martin Bachmann, of Cytos, said: "You could really stockpile it. In the case of a pandemic, that would be a huge advantage.

    "If you were to start making a traditional vaccine at the start of a pandemic, there is no way there would be enough."

    The Government believes a bird flu pandemic is inevitable, killing 50,000 people in Britain alone.

    However, it acknowledges that the bug could be much more lethal - infecting one in two people and claiming more than 700,000 lives.

    Normal winter flu can also kill, claiming up to 12,000 lives a year in the UK.

    Although a vaccine exists, constant changes in the virus's appearance have until now made it impossible to create just one flu vaccine. Instead a new vaccine is put together each year to protect against the particular strains circulating at that time.

    In addition, the virus used in the jab is grown in hen's eggs - a time-consuming process that yields just one shot of vaccine per egg.

    The new jabs would be grown in huge vats of bacterial 'soup', with just two pints of liquid providing 10,000 doses of vaccine.

    Current flu vaccines focus on two proteins on the surface of the virus. However, these constantly mutate in a bid to fool the immune system, making it impossible for vaccine manufacturers to keep up with the creation of each new strain.

    The universal vaccines focus on a different protein called M2, which has barely changed during the last 100 years.

    The protein is found in all types of Influenza A, including the current bird flu and the virus that caused the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic which killed up to 50 million across the globe.

    Normally, such vaccines would have to go through at least five years of human tests before going on the market. However, if a bird flu pandemic occurs before that, they could be made more quickly available.

    Zurich-based Cytos, which is also developing anti-smoking and obesity vaccines, has showed that its version of the jab stops mice dying from a dose of flu strong enough to kill them four-times over.

    The vaccinated animals were also spared the fever that normally goes along with flu.

    Although it is too early to say what the effect would be in humans, an initial course of two or three shots could provide long-lasting immunity, topped up with booster shots given every five to ten years.

    Dr Ashley Birkett, of Acambis, said: "It wouldn't be that one shot protects for life but you would need fewer doses over your lifetime."

    In addition, the jabs could be produced in vast quantities and stockpiled ahead of a flu pandemic - or even given to people in advance.

    In contrast, a traditionally-produced vaccine, matched to the specific strain of flu, would not be available until around six months after the start of the pandemic.

    The new vaccines only protect against influenza A - the version of the bug responsible for pandemic flu and the most severe cases of winter flu.

    However, it may also be possible to create a similar jab against influenza B, which causes a milder form of winter flu.

    Professor John Oxford, Britain's leading flu expert, said the development of a universal vaccine was the "holy grail" of flu research.

    He added: "If you get a M2 vaccine which protects against the whole caboodle in the same vaccine, the possibilities are huge."

    But, others cautioned that there is no guarantee that the jabs would be as effective in humans as it has been in animals.

    Virologist Professor Ian Jones, of the University of Reading, said: "It is an encouraging technique which may have a role to play but it is too soon to assume that it will translate into a universal vaccine in the human population."

    Dr Jim Robertson, a vaccine expert from the government-funded National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, said the main advantage of a universal jab would be lasting immunity.

    "If it works, it will be lovely," he said. "The best result would be that it would last for a long, long time."

    Dr Ron Cutler, an infectious diseases expert from the University of East London, said: "Continual protection would be a tremendous advantage against flu."

    He cautioned however, that there is no guarantee that the M2 protein will not mutate in the future - meaning the jab will have to be regularly reformulated.

    December 17, 2006

    The Next Nobel Prize? Joint U.S.-Canadian Research Team Reverses Diabetes in Mice

    Hospital_for_sick_children_atriumResearchers reverse diabetes in mice: Discovery opens door to new treatment strategies

    Researchers at The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), the University of Calgary and The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) said on Friday that nerve cells in the pancreas may be a cause of type-1 diabetes in mice.

    Their research demonstrated that diabetes is controlled by abnormalities in the sensory nociceptor (pain-related) nerve endings in the pancreatic islet cells that produce insulin. This discovery, a breakthrough that has long been the elusive goal of diabetes research, has led to new treatment strategies for diabetes, achieving reversal of the disease without severe, toxic immunosuppression.

    In their experiments, diabetic mice became healthy virtually overnight after researchers injected a substance to counteract the effect of malfunctioning pain neurons in the pancreas.

    Their claim that the body’s nervous system helps trigger diabetes, if true, could open the door to a potential cure for millions of people who are affected by the disease world-wide. The discovery has stunned even the scientists at a Toronto hospital participated in the study.

    Studies have focused on the immune system as the sole offender and research into the fundamental mechanisms of the disease have been overdue. Pancreatic islet cells, the cells responsible for the production of pancreatic hormones such as insulin, play a key role in the disease. In diabetes, islets become inflamed and are ultimately destroyed, making insulin production impossible. Insulin deficiency is fatal and current insulin replacement therapies cannot prevent many side effects such as heart attacks, blindness, strokes, loss of limbs and kidney function.

    Defective nerve endings may attract immune system proteins that mistakenly attack the pancreas, destroying its ability to make insulin—it is this destruction is what causes diabetes. The defective nerve endings did not secrete enough of the peptides to keep enough insulin flowing. Recently, the group found an unsuspected control circuit between insulin-producing islets and their associated sensory or pain nerves. This circuit sustains normal islet function.

    In an interview, Dr. Michael Salter, co-principal investigator, senior scientist at SickKids, professor of Physiology and director of the Centre for the Study of Pain at the University of Toronto, responded: “I couldn’t believe it…mice with diabetes suddenly didn’t have diabetes any more.”

    Dr. Hans Michael Dosch of the University of Toronto, study principal investigator, senior scientist at SickKids and professor of Pediatrics and Immunology at the University of Toronto, said,

    “I’ve never seen anything like it.... In my career, this is unique. We started to look at nervous system elements that seemed to play a role in Type 1 diabetes and found that specific sensory neurons are critical for islet immune attack in the pancreas.... These nerves secrete insufficient neuropeptides which sustain normal islet function, creating a vicious circle of progressive islet stress.”

    Mice

    Using diabetes-prone NOD mice, the gold-standard diabetes model, the research group learned how to treat the abnormality by supplying neuropeptides and even reversed established diabetes.

    Dr. Salter said,

    “The major discovery was that removal of sensory neurons expressing the receptor TRPV1 neurons in NOD mice prevented islet cell inflammation and diabetes in most animals, which led us to fundamentally new insights into the mechanisms of this disease…. Disease protection occurred despite the fact that autoimmunity continues in the animals. This helped us to focus our studies on finding the new control circuit in the islets.”

    Strikingly, injection of the neuropeptide substance P cleared islet inflammation in NOD mice within a day and independently normalized the elevated insulin resistance normally associated with the disease. The two effects synergized to reverse diabetes without severely toxic immunosuppression. In lay terms, injecting a piece of protein, or peptide, to repair the defect cured diabetic mice "overnight," Dosch said. "It is very effective in reversing diabetes."

    Type-1 diabetes, still commonly called “Juvenile Diabetes,” is the most serious form of the illness that typically first appears in childhood, affects two million Americans and 200,000 Canadians. There is no known way of preventing it.

    The study’s conclusions have upset conventional wisdom that Type 1 diabetes was solely caused by auto-immune responses—the body’s immune system turning on itself.

    The team will soon begin clinical studies on people whose family history suggests they are at risk of developing Type-1 diabetes to see if their sensory nerves work well. Trials could then begin injecting peptides into patients with diabetes or those at high risk. It could take a number of years, Dosch said.
    The researchers are now setting out to confirm that the connection between sensory nerves and diabetes holds true in humans. If it does, they will see if their treatments have the same effects on people as they did on mice. If they do not, Dosch said, that would suggest the bad nerve endings were a cause of diabetes, not only an effect as has been widely assumed.

    Dr. Dosch had concluded in a 1999 paper that there were surprising similarities between diabetes and multiple sclerosis, a central nervous system disease. His interest was also piqued by the presence around the insulin-producing islets of an “enormous” number of nerves, pain neurons primarily used to signal the brain that tissue has been damaged.

    Suspecting a link between the nerves and diabetes, he and Dr. Salter used an old experimental trick—injecting capsaicin, the active ingredient in hot chili peppers, to kill the pancreatic sensory nerves in mice that had an equivalent of Type 1 diabetes.

    “Then we had the biggest shock of our lives,” Dr. Dosch said. Almost immediately, the islets began producing insulin normally. “It was a shock…really out of left field, because nothing in the literature was saying anything about this.”

    It turns out the nerves secrete neuropeptides that are instrumental in the proper functioning of the islets. Further study by the team, which also involved the University of Calgary and the Jackson Laboratory in Maine, found that the nerves in diabetic mice were releasing too little of the neuropeptides, resulting in a “vicious cycle” of stress on the islets.

    Next, they injected the neuropeptide “substance P” in the pancreases of diabetic mice, a demanding task given the tiny size of the rodent organs. The results were dramatic.

    The islet inflammation cleared up and the diabetes was gone. Some have remained in that state for as long as four months, with just one injection.

    The studies were extended to Type 2 (obesity-associated) diabetes, in which insulin resistance is even more severe, using a number of additional model systems, thus generating strong evidence that treating the islet-sensory nerve circuit can work to dramatically normalize insulin resistance in models of Type 2 diabetes. The discovery that their treatments curbed the insulin resistance that is the hallmark of Type 2 diabetes, and that insulin resistance is a major factor in Type 1 diabetes, suggesting the two illnesses are quite similar.

    Dr. Pere Santamaria, study collaborator and professor of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the University of Calgary, said:

    “This discovery opens up an entirely new field of investigations in Type 1 and possibly Type 2 diabetes, as well as tissue selective autoimmunity in general.... We have created a better understanding of both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, with new therapeutic targets and approaches derived for both diseases.”

    “We are now working hard to extend our studies to patients, where many have sensory nerve abnormalities, but we don’t yet know if these abnormalities start early in life and if they contribute to disease development,” added Dosch.

    He said the findings might also hold promise for Type-2 Diabetes -- which affects about 10 times as many people as Type-1 -- though the results were not as strong.

    The researchers found that the peptide injections lowered resistance to insulin, which is used to move blood glucose to the body's cells.

    People with Type-2 diabetes often are obese. By lowering insulin resistance, it might be possible to prevent further obesity and damage from diabetes.

    Dosch said,

    "Whether we can reverse the process, I don't know. But I think we can certainly impact on the major physiological problem, and that's insulin sensitivity.... So if these people then have normal insulin, then a little activity, then a little walking would actually help lose weight, and then you stop the vicious circle."

    The researchers caution they have yet to confirm their findings in people, but say they expect results from human studies within a year or so. “There is a great deal of promise,” Dr. Salter said. Any treatment to help at least some patients would likely be years from hitting the market.

    They also conclude that there are far more similarities than previously thought between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and that nerves likely play a role in other chronic inflammatory conditions, such as asthma and Crohn’s disease.

    Insulin replacement therapy is the only treatment of Type 1, and cannot prevent many of the side effects, from heart attacks to kidney failure.

    In Type 1 diabetes, the pancreas does not produce enough insulin to shift glucose into the cells that need it. In Type 2 diabetes, the insulin that is produced is not used effectively—something called insulin resistance—also resulting in poor absorption of glucose. The problems stem partly from inflammation—and eventual death—of insulin-producing islet cells in the pancreas.

    While pain scientists have been receptive to the research, immunologists have voiced skepticism at the idea of the nervous system playing such a major role in the disease. Editors of Cell put the Toronto researchers through vigorous review to prove the validity of their conclusions, though an editorial in the publication gives a positive review of the work.

    “It will no doubt cause a great deal of consternation,” said Dr. Salter about his paper.

    The “paradigm-changing” study opens “a novel, exciting door to address one of the diseases with large societal impact,” said Dr. Christian Stohler, a leading U.S. pain specialist and dean of dentistry at the University of Maryland, who has reviewed the work. “The treatment and diagnosis of neuropathic diseases is poised to take a dramatic leap forward because of the impressive research.”
    The excitement over the conclusions of the team’s research has been described as “palpable.”

    Here is the team’s executive summary as published in the Medical Journal, “Cell:”

    Cell_logo

    In type 1 diabetes, T cell-mediated death of pancreatic β cells produces insulin deficiency. However, what attracts or restricts broadly autoreactive lymphocyte pools to the pancreas remains unclear. We report that TRPV1+ pancreatic sensory neurons control islet inflammation and insulin resistance. Eliminating these neurons in diabetes-prone NOD mice prevents insulitis and diabetes, despite systemic persistence of pathogenic T cell pools. Insulin resistance and β cell stress of prediabetic NOD mice are prevented when TRPV1+ neurons are eliminated. TRPV1NOD, localized to the Idd4.1 diabetes-risk locus, is a hypofunctional mutant, mediating depressed neurogenic inflammation. Delivering the neuropeptide substance P by intra-arterial injection into the NOD pancreas reverses abnormal insulin resistance, insulitis, and diabetes for weeks. Concordantly, insulin sensitivity is enhanced in trpv1−/− mice, whereas insulitis/diabetes-resistant NODxB6Idd4-congenic mice, carrying wild-type TRPV1, show restored TRPV1 function and insulin sensitivity. Our data uncover a fundamental role for insulin-responsive TRPV1+ sensory neurons in β cell function and diabetes pathoetiology.

    The following medical researchers and scientists participated in the study—and have my personal vote for the Nobel Prize, just for the progress they’ve already made in their quest to find a cure for diabetes:

    Rozita Razavi: lead author
    Yin Chan
    Dr.F. Nikoo Afifiyan
    Dr.Xue Jun Liu
    Dr. Xiang Wan
    Jason Yantha
    Hubert Tsui
    Dr. Lan Tang from www.sickkids.ca. (SickKids is committed to healthier children for a better world).
    Sue Tsai from the University of Calgary
    Pere Santamaria, professor of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the University of Calgary
    Dr.John P. Driver, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine
    Dr.David Serreze, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine
    Michael W. Salter: a pain expert at the The Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, University of Toronto
    H.-Michael Dosch: immunologist at The Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, University of Toronto and a leader of the studies

    For the full report, CLICK HERE

    Cell Article

    SickKids: SickKids is committed to healthier children for a better world.

    National Post Article

    Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International