"...the reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around. That's how she got to be senator from New York. We keep forgetting it. She didn't win there on her merit." (Chris Matthews on MSNBC's "Morning Joe")
"...The question is, which Hillary Clinton's going to show up? In the last few days, we've just about seen it all. At Thursday's debate in Austin, Texas, Clinton showed a softer side, saying that she was honored to be there with Barack Obama. A couple of days later, she morphed into a scolding mother, talking down to a child, waving her finger and saying, "Shame on you, Barack Obama." She called him out, demanding that he meet her in Ohio for a debate on his tactics and behavior in the campaign." (Jack Cafferty, CNN's The Situation Room)
"...You know, I think someone's going to go out there and take her behind the barn...." (Pete Snyder, Republican Strategist, on Fox)
"Well, Sarah, I'm calling you a liar. And not even a good one. Trig Paxson Van Palin is not your son. He is your grandson. The sooner you come forward with this revelation to the public, the better." (Inky99, Daily Kos)
"Children with Down syndrome require an awful lot of attention. The role of Vice President, it seems to me, would take up an awful lot of her time, and it raises the issue of how much time will she have to dedicate to her newborn child?” (John Roberts, CNN)
“In small groups, Palin can seem like the young, trophy running mate.” (David Wright, ABC News)
"Did Palin Take Proper PreNatal Care?" (Alan Colmes, of Hannity & Colmes)
Are these anything close to what we would expect to hear about any of our colleagues in the workplace?
Chances are, if you did, the next thing you would hear about would be the sexual harrassment suit that was rocketing toward the person who said it.
You would hope so, at least.
Sexual harassment, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, is defined according to the following circumstances:
- The victim as well as the harasser may be a woman or a man. The victim does not have to be of the opposite sex.
- The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, an agent of the employer, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or a non-employee.
- The victim does not have to be the person harassed but could be anyone affected by the offensive conduct.
- Unlawful sexual harassment may occur without economic injury to or discharge of the victim.
- The harasser's conduct must be unwelcome.
Whether you're a fan of Hillary Clinton or Sarah Palin, it's a pretty safe bet that you've been screaming at your television set--did he (or she) really just say that? -No man would ever be subjected to the kind of comments or criticism that either of these women have had to undergo.
Indeed, all of it, combined, should strike us as a demeaning, misogynist rampage against all women--regardless of party affiliation. The underlying implication for those people who say or publish such statements seems clear: they're just not ready to accept a woman in either top slot--as either POTUS or VPOTUS.
Senator? Absolutely, we have about 16 of them: Hutchison, Snowe, Dole, Murray....
Or CEO? Sure, lots of 'em out there too: Braly, Woertz, Nooyi, Rosenfeld....
But president or vice president? Chances are, you won't hear a direct answer to that one (Instead, read the quotes above).
Yeah, but... "Hey, it's politics--and you know, it's a rough and tumble game...all's fair...," I've heard some say.
Well, no...actually, it's sexual harrassment (unwelcome sexually based behavior and public humiliation). Just on a grander scale. And in some more severe cases, it could fit the definition of libel perfectly.
And now to make matters worse, the mainstream media has the newfound ability to quote bloggers who are not chained to their "strict" standards of accountability and responsibility. And it's opened a whole new world of journalistic possibilities. None good. Or responsible, for that matter.
If you have your doubts, just ask yourself: what if it were your daughter, your coworker, or your mother to whom these comments were being directed?
I'll bet you'd be mad as hell (if you aren't already).
You have a right to be angry. Because you are affected by it. And by the way, as such, you're a victim of the harrassment too.
The question is, will you accept it or do something about it?
So here's my point. Until the time comes when we achieve the emotional maturity to be able to accept a woman as a serious candidate for the presidency or vice presidency without dragging her through the mud with all the gender-specific innuendo and offensive critiques we've seen thus far during this campaign season, it's quite possible that as a country we probably just don't deserve her as President or Vice President...whomever she may be.
Our loss.